Market Watch

Loading metals, manufacturing indicators, and industrial stocks...

The $1.77 Trillion Reshoring Boom Isn't Showing Up in the Concrete
Supply Chain

The $1.77 Trillion Reshoring Boom Isn't Showing Up in the Concrete

Manufacturing Mag Staff·June 13, 2026

This article may contain AI-assisted content. Verify details with primary sources before acting on them.

Share:
Share

Why It Matters

Announced US manufacturing commitments have crossed $1.765 trillion since January 2025. Yet factory construction put-in-place has fallen roughly 21% from its mid-2024 peak. Both numbers are real — and reconciling them is the whole game for capex planning.

Two numbers describe American reshoring right now, and they point in opposite directions. One says the United States has lined up $1.765 trillion in announced manufacturing investment since January 2025. The other says factory construction spending — the actual money turning into foundations and steel — has fallen roughly 21% from its mid-2024 peak. Both are accurate. The gap between them is the most important thing a capital planner can understand about the current cycle.

The reconciliation isn't a paradox. It's a measurement problem: one figure counts intent, the other counts concrete. And once you separate the two, a cleaner story emerges — a semiconductor construction spike that is normalizing, sitting on top of a non-electronics manufacturing base that is still quietly growing.

What the $1.765 trillion actually is

The headline figure comes from IndustrialSage's US Manufacturing Investment Tracker, which counts $1.765 trillion in announced commitments across 160 companies and 37 states since January 2025. The methodology is disciplined in one respect: it captures only projects of $50 million or more, verified against SEC filings, company releases, and government announcements (last updated June 5, 2026).

It is also top-heavy. A handful of mega-pledges drive most of the total: Apple at $600 billion, Micron at $200 billion, IBM at $150 billion, TSMC at $100 billion, Texas Instruments at $60 billion, Johnson & Johnson at $58 billion, AstraZeneca at $54.5 billion, and Roche at $50.7 billion. Strip those eight names out and the headline shrinks dramatically.

The critical caveat is structural: the tracker does not distinguish between a project that has been announced, one that has broken ground, and one that has been completed. It measures stated intent over a multi-year horizon — not capital deployed in any given quarter. A $600 billion pledge spread across years of corporate planning lands in the same column as a fab pouring concrete today. That is the core of the reconciliation gap.

What put-in-place spending measures

The counterweight is the U.S. Census Bureau's manufacturing construction series — construction put-in-place — which records the value of work actually performed. This is the only number that reflects real concrete.

By that measure, manufacturing construction peaked at roughly $239 billion on a monthly basis in June 2024 and has declined about 21% since, to roughly $189 billion, according to IoT Analytics' read of the Census data. FactCheck.org, working from Census and FRED figures, puts the quarterly decline at 6.7% from Q4 2024 through Q3 2025, against a 2024 annual average near $235.6 billion. Different windows, same direction: the concrete side is shrinking while the announcement side swells.

The semiconductor unwind

The decline is not broad-based. It is almost entirely a semiconductor story. The computer, electronic, and electrical (CE&E) construction category — which at its peak represented more than half of all factory construction spending — is down roughly 44% from its July 2024 high, per IoT Analytics.

The mechanism is the 2022 CHIPS Act. It front-loaded a wave of semiconductor construction that pulled spending forward into 2023–2024, producing a spike that is now normalizing as projects stretch out or slip. ABC chief economist Anirban Basu, cited by FactCheck.org, pegged the trailing-12-month drop at nearly 10% and tied the run-up directly to CHIPS Act activity. When the largest, most front-loaded category in a series rolls over, it drags the headline down even if everything else holds.

The split screen

And everything else is not holding flat — it is rising. Excluding electronics, manufacturing construction spending rose about 5.6% between February 2025 and March 2026, according to IoT Analytics — roughly 2.3% in real terms after about 3.3% inflation. Modest, but positive and real.

That is the split screen. The "factory construction is falling" headline is a semiconductor normalization, not an all-manufacturing retreat. Real capacity continues to land in autos and EVs, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, and appliances — the sectors where put-in-place dollars are flowing — even as fab spending unwinds from its CHIPS-fueled spike.

Broken ground vs. slipped

The megaprojects make the announcement-versus-reality gap concrete. Intel's roughly $28 billion New Albany, Ohio fab complex — once the marquee CHIPS-era groundbreaking — has been delayed again, with the first building now targeted for 2030 and the second around 2031. Local reporting underscores the scale of the slip: five to six years past the original 2025 target. Micron's Clay, New York fab saw its groundbreaking move from June 2024 to late 2025.

These projects remain in the announced-investment column at full value. But the concrete they represent has been pushed years to the right — which is precisely why CE&E put-in-place spending fell while the tracker total kept climbing. Announced dollars don't decay when timelines slip; poured concrete does.

Forward look

The near-term direction is down. The AIA's Consensus Construction Forecast (January 2026), as reported by FactCheck.org, projects manufacturing construction declines continuing into 2026–2027. What could reverse it: tariff-driven onshoring pulling new non-electronics capacity forward, CHIPS disbursements finally converting to construction, and delayed fabs restarting their build cycles. None of those is guaranteed, and all operate on multi-year lead times.

The operator takeaway

For anyone underwriting capex, supplier capacity, or regional demand off these headlines, the discipline is straightforward. Treat announced dollars as a pipeline of intent with long lead times and high slippage risk — not as capacity you can plan against. Underwrite to put-in-place trends and sector mix, not press-release totals. And read the construction data by category: the all-manufacturing line is being distorted by a semiconductor unwind, while the non-electronics base it sits on is still expanding. The boom is real in both columns — it just hasn't all reached the concrete yet, and some of it won't for years.

Sources

Share

More Articles