Three of the most closely watched new US semiconductor fabs published schedule updates within about a week of each other in October 2026. Put them in order by the companies' own dates and the sequence looks simple: Samsung's Taylor Fab 1 in Texas first, Intel's Fab 62 in Arizona second, and GlobalFoundries' first new fab in Malta, New York, third. The catch is that each company is describing a different milestone. Samsung says Taylor Fab 1 will be "fully operational" by the end of 2026, while customers begin production there in 2027. Intel expects "operations to begin" at Fab 62 by the end of 2028. GlobalFoundries (GF) says its first new Malta fab will "come online" in 2029. These are three different events. A supplier planning headcount, inventory or a site office around them should not treat them as one.
The money behind each project also works differently. Samsung has a conventional federal grant. Intel's unpaid grants were turned into a government equity stake. GF will operate fabs that Japan is paying for. Those differences determine who absorbs the loss if wafer demand falls short, and they help explain what each company has and has not committed to.
Which new US semiconductor fab will ramp first?
On stated dates, Samsung's Taylor Fab 1 is first, with customer production scheduled for 2027. Intel's Fab 62 is second (operations by end-2028) and GF's first new Malta fab is third (online in 2029). The scorecard below sets out what each company has actually said.
| Site | Stated milestone and date | Node or technology | Who is paying | Public support | Next supplier-relevant step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Taylor Fab 1 (Texas) | Fully operational by end-2026; customer production from 2027; Tesla volume expected 2H 2027 | 2nm logic | Samsung (over $37B across Taylor and Austin) | CHIPS grant of up to $4.745B; $250M Texas grant | Consumables and services as customer production starts in 2027; Fab 2 construction from November 2026 |
| Intel Fab 62 (Ocotillo, Chandler, Arizona) | Construction and tool installation underway now; operations by end-2028 | Not named by Intel | Intel | Unpaid CHIPS and Secure Enclave grants converted into a 9.9% US government stake in Intel | Tool hook-up and facilities subcontracts, now through 2028 |
| GlobalFoundries Malta Fab 1 (New York) | Groundbreaking by end-2026; ready for equipment in 2028; online in 2029 | Not specified for the new fabs | Japan (about $10B for the first fab, up to $21B for two) | Existing CHIPS award amended ($955M reallocated); Commerce taking about 4% of GF | Site work now; equipment window around 2028 |
When will Samsung's Taylor fab start production?
Samsung says customers will begin production at Taylor in 2027, and it expects volume production of Tesla's AI chips there in the second half of that year. The company separately says Fab 1 will be fully operational by the end of 2026, a milestone about the building and tools rather than customer output.
The end-2026 target comes from KXAN's October 15, 2026 report, and it repeats what a Samsung spokesperson told KVUE in July: the company "aims to be fully operational by the end of 2026." The customer timeline is more relevant to suppliers. At Samsung's SAFE Forum on May 28, 2026, Margaret Han, vice president of Samsung Electronics Foundry's North American operations, said: "Customers are scheduled to begin production at the Taylor fab starting next year. We are ready." (TechTimes).
Tesla is the anchor customer. Electrek reports that Samsung "expects volume production of Tesla's AI chips there in the second half of 2027." TechTimes reports a $16.5B Tesla contract signed in July 2025 that covers AI5 and AI6 through 2033.
The schedule has slipped before. Samsung announced Taylor in November 2021 with a $17B initial investment. According to TechTimes, the production target has since moved from 2H 2024 to 2025, then to 2H 2026, and now to 2027. We argued in our June 14 analysis that the delay comes from Taylor's order book, not from construction. Nothing in the October updates changes that view.
Samsung is also adding capacity. Jonathan Taylor, EVP of Infra Technology at Samsung Austin Semiconductor, told KXAN that construction of a second Taylor fab should begin in early November 2026, with completion expected in 2030. He called Fab 2 "one and a half times bigger than Fab One." According to KXAN, both plants will use 2nm technology and the campus is expected to support about 3,500 direct jobs. Samsung also announced $22.84M in Central Texas community and workforce investments.
When will Intel Fab 62 start operations?
Intel expects operations at Fab 62 to begin by the end of 2028. Tool installation is already underway, which makes the next two years the busy period for tool hook-up and facilities subcontractors. Intel has not said what process node the fab will run or how many wafers it will produce.
The primary statement is an Intel newsroom opinion piece by Naga Chandrasekaran, EVP and chief technology and operations officer of Intel Foundry: "construction and tool installation at Fab 62 are now fully underway, and we expect operations to begin by the end of 2028." Trade coverage from Semiecosystem and TrendForce dates the update to about October 21, 2026. ABC15 and the Phoenix Business Journal confirmed the end-2028 timing locally.
Fab 62 is the sixth high-volume fab on Intel's Ocotillo campus, according to Semiecosystem. The fab next door, Fab 52, already makes chips on Intel 18A. TrendForce and TechTimes both note that Intel has not confirmed Fab 62's node or planned wafer capacity. TechTimes also reports that Intel has said it will not fund high-volume 14A production without a significant external foundry customer, and that the window for that customer decision runs through early 2027. For suppliers, this means the building and tools are on a schedule, but what the fab will make, and in what volume, depends on Intel's foundry sales.
Intel's Ohio project remains far behind. Intel says the first major structural truss is now in place on its first New Albany fab. TrendForce cites The Next Web as reporting an opening in 2030-2031, and Semiecosystem says the opening date is still unclear.
Who is paying for GlobalFoundries' new Malta fabs?
Japan is paying. Under the US-Japan trade and investment deal, Japan will provide up to $21B: about $10B for GF's first new 300mm fab at Malta and about $10B more for a second. GF will be technology provider and operator. GF's release does not say who will own the fabs.
GF announced the arrangement on October 14, 2026, and filed the release with the SEC. It falls under the larger framework in a September 2025 White House fact sheet, in which Japan committed $550B for US investment in projects "selected by President Trump," with semiconductors among the target sectors.
According to GF, the first fab is expected to come online in 2029 and to add about 900,000 300mm wafers a year of US capacity when fully operational. The second would add about the same. The site "is permitted and shovel-ready," and GF expects to break ground before the end of 2026. ENR adds more detail on timing: the first fab should be "ready for equipment in 2028" and produce first wafers in 2029, and a go/no-go decision on the second fab is due before the end of 2028. CEO Tim Breen told ENR that "early enablement work on the site is already underway" and that GF has "lined up our key suppliers." GF will manage construction itself.
Two Japanese companies have defined roles. Tokyo Electron is the equipment and technology partner, and Renesas is a customer. "We are planning around GF's new capacity in New York as an extension of Renesas' own production footprint," said Renesas CEO Hidetoshi Shibata. Apple, Cirrus Logic and GM executives are also quoted in the release. Breen's explanation of why GF was chosen: "fabs of this scale require more than capital. They require differentiated technology, operational excellence and a proven ability to execute."
The release names no process node for the new fabs. The CHIPS money GF already had is going to specialty technology, not leading-edge logic: its existing award was amended to reallocate $955M to silicon photonics, SiGe and advanced packaging at Malta and Burlington, Vermont. Separately, Commerce will receive an equity stake of about 4% in GF (Construction Dive). GF projects about 27,000 construction and ecosystem jobs and more than 1,000 high-skilled manufacturing jobs in New York's Capital Region, figures also reported by Spectrum News.
How do the three funding structures compare?
The three projects carry public money in three different forms, and each form leaves the risk with a different party.
-
Samsung: a conventional grant. Commerce awarded Samsung Austin Semiconductor "up to $4.745 billion in direct funding" (NIST) against expected investment of "over $37 billion dollars in the region." That total covers two 2nm logic fabs and an R&D fab in Taylor plus an FD-SOI expansion in Austin. NIST estimates over 3,500 manufacturing jobs and 12,000 construction jobs. Texas added a $250M Texas Semiconductor Innovation Fund grant. Samsung's own capital carries most of the exposure if Taylor runs underloaded.
-
Intel: grants converted to equity. Under an August 2025 agreement (SEC 8-K exhibit), the US government made an "$8.9 billion investment in Intel common stock," buying 433.3 million shares at $20.47, "equivalent to a 9.9 percent stake." The money came from "the remaining $5.7 billion in grants previously awarded, but not yet paid" under CHIPS, plus $3.2B from Secure Enclave. The stake is passive. The government also holds a five-year warrant at $20 a share for another 5%, exercisable only if Intel stops owning at least 51% of its foundry business. Intel says it is "investing more than $100 billion to expand its U.S. sites." Taxpayers now share in Intel's upside and downside as a shareholder, not as a grant-maker with clawback terms.
-
GF: foreign-funded capacity run by a US operator. Japan provides the capital for the new fabs. GF supplies the technology and runs the fabs. Commerce takes about 4% of GF as a company. GF's balance sheet is not funding the expansion, which changes what a weak market would cost GF compared with an owner-operator.
For an investor, the useful question for each project is who is out of pocket if volumes disappoint. For Samsung it is mainly Samsung. For Intel it is Intel and, through the stake, the US government. For Malta, Japan's capital is at risk, and the public record does not yet show how ownership and returns are divided.
When will local suppliers and contractors see orders?
Construction and site trades see orders first: at Samsung's Fab 2 from November 2026 and at GF Malta, where enablement work has already started. Tool hook-up work is already running at Intel's Fab 62. GF's equipment window opens around 2028.
-
Now: Construction trades at Samsung Taylor Fab 2 (construction start in early November 2026) and site work at GF Malta (enablement underway, groundbreaking by year-end).
-
Now through 2028: Tool hook-up, process piping, electrical and facilities subcontracts at Intel Fab 62 while tool installation continues.
-
From 2027: Consumables, chemicals, gases, spare parts and field services at Taylor Fab 1 as customer production begins.
-
Around 2028: GF Malta Fab 1's equipment window, with Tokyo Electron already named as equipment and technology partner.
Only Intel has put a number on its supplier base. Chandrasekaran writes that Intel works with "more than 4500 suppliers in 49 states, generating more than $29 billion in annual domestic spending." None of the companies has publicly named its general contractor in the sources we reviewed. At Malta, ENR reports that records it reviewed in 2024 showed JE Dunn Construction hired for a new Malta facility, and that JE Dunn referred questions to GF. GF says it has its key suppliers lined up and will manage construction itself, so regional subcontractors should expect to bid through GF's own construction organization.
Does the 48D tax credit deadline matter for these fabs?
It is relevant background for the late-2026 start dates. The federal advanced manufacturing investment credit under 26 USC 48D is now 35% of qualified investment, and it "shall not apply to property the construction of which begins after December 31, 2026." TechTimes attributes the increase from 25% to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Samsung's Fab 2 construction start in November and GF's planned groundbreaking before year-end both fall inside that window. None of the companies has said it will claim the credit for these projects, and none has said the deadline set its schedule. Read the timing as context. After December 31, any new US fab project starts without the credit, which changes the investment case for whatever comes next.
Verdict: who ramps first, and what limits each schedule
On the companies' stated dates, Samsung is likely first to customer wafers in 2027, Intel second with operations by end-2028, and GF third with its first fab online in 2029. In each case the deciding constraint is something other than construction.
-
Samsung Taylor depends on customers and execution. The building is nearly done, and the schedule has slipped three times before. Watch whether Tesla volume arrives in 2H 2027 as Samsung expects and whether more customers are announced. A tier-2 supplier should tie consumables capacity and staffing to confirmed customer starts, not to the "fully operational" date.
-
Intel Fab 62 depends on a node decision and a foundry customer. Tool installation is real work happening now, but Intel has not said what the fab will produce, and TechTimes reports that 14A volume production depends on an external customer, with a decision window through early 2027. Facilities subcontractors have a two-year runway. Suppliers of process materials should wait for a named node before committing capacity.
-
GF Malta depends on the second-fab decision. The first fab has its funding, a permitted site and named partners. The second roughly $10B fab faces a go/no-go decision before the end of 2028. Construction contractors should plan for one fab and treat the second as an option. Equipment and installation suppliers should aim at the 2028 equipment window.
The practical advice for operators and suppliers is to translate each company's wording before planning around it. "Fully operational," "operations begin" and "come online" are three different milestones, and the order that suppliers see work (construction first, then tools, then consumables) does not follow the ramp order in the headlines.
Related reading
Sources
-
Intel newsroom: Building America's Capacity to Innovate (Naga Chandrasekaran)
-
Semiecosystem: Intel Provides Fab Updates For Arizona, Ohio (Oct 21, 2026)
-
TrendForce: Intel Begins Equipment Installation at Arizona Fab 62 (Oct 22, 2026)
-
TechTimes: Intel Begins Tool Move-In at Fab 62 (Oct 22, 2026)
-
ABC15 / Phoenix Business Journal: Intel's sixth Arizona chip factory moves forward
-
KXAN via Yahoo Finance: Samsung to build second Taylor chip plant (Oct 15, 2026)
-
KVUE via Yahoo Finance: Samsung plans second Taylor plant (July 30, 2026)
-
TechTimes: Samsung Taylor Fab Production Confirmed for 2027 (May 31, 2026)
-
Electrek: Samsung's Texas fab and Tesla's AI5 chip (July 13, 2026)
-
ENR: GlobalFoundries Advances New York Chip Fab (Oct 16, 2026)
-
Construction Dive: GlobalFoundries building New York fabs under US-Japan deal (Oct 20, 2026)
-
Spectrum News: Japan selects GlobalFoundries for Malta fabs (Oct 14, 2026)
-
White House: U.S.-Japan Framework Agreement fact sheet (Sept 5, 2025)
-
ManufacturingMag: Taylor's 2nm delay as an order-book problem (June 14, 2026)
